We were sending illegal parameter. This isn't correct. The parameters are
legal, we just don't have an overlap. A more appropriate alert is
handshake failure.
Fixes#2919
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/6010)
We cannot provide a certificate status on a resumption so we should
ignore this extension in that case.
Fixes#1662
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5897)
If a server has been configured to use an ECDSA certificate, we should
allow it regardless of whether the server's own supported groups list
includes the certificate's group.
Fixes#2033
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5607)
This could in theory result in an overread - but due to the over allocation
of the underlying buffer does not represent a security issue.
Thanks to Fedor Indutny for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5415)
This is based on a heavily modified version of commit db0f35dda by Todd
Short from the master branch.
We are adding this because it used to be possible to disable reneg using
the flag SSL3_FLAGS_NO_RENEGOTIATE_CIPHERS in 1.0.2. This is no longer
possible because of the opacity work.
A point to note about this is that if an application built against new
1.1.0 headers (that know about the new option SSL_OP_NO_RENEGOTIATION
option) is run using an older version of 1.1.0 (that doesn't know about
the option) then the option will be accepted but nothing will happen, i.e.
renegotiation will not be prevented. There's probably not much we can do
about that.
Fixes#4739
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4901)
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(cherry picked from commit cde6145ba19a2fce039cf054a89e49f67c623c59)
WebSphere application server cannot handle having an empty
extension (e.g. EMS/EtM) as the last extension in a client hello.
This moves the SigAlgs extension last (before any padding) for TLSv1.2
to avoid this issue.
Force the padding extension to a minimum length of 1.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3927)
ECDHE is not properly defined for SSLv3. Commit fe55c4a2 prevented ECDHE
from being selected in that protocol. However, historically, servers do
still select ECDHE anyway so that commit causes interoperability problems.
Clients that previously worked when talking to an SSLv3 server could now
fail.
This commit introduces an exception which enables a client to continue in
SSLv3 if the server selected ECDHE.
(cherry picked from commit 8af91fd9d08487e0dffb6ccac5f42633c964f3f0)
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3734)
RFC 7301 mandates that the server SHALL respond with a fatal
"no_application_protocol" alert when there is no overlap between
the client's supplied list and the server's list of supported protocols.
In commit 062178678f5374b09f00d70796f6e692e8775aca we changed from
ignoring non-success returns from the supplied alpn_select_cb() to
treating such non-success returns as indicative of non-overlap and
sending the fatal alert.
In effect, this is using the presence of an alpn_select_cb() as a proxy
to attempt to determine whether the application has configured a list
of supported protocols. However, there may be cases in which an
application's architecture leads it to supply an alpn_select_cb() but
have that callback be configured to take no action on connections that
do not have ALPN configured; returning SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_NOACK from
the callback would be the natural way to do so. Unfortunately, the
aforementioned behavior change also treated SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_NOACK as
indicative of no overlap and terminated the connection; this change
supplies special handling for SSL_TLSEXT_ERR_NOACK returns from the
callback. In effect, it provides a way for a callback to obtain the
behavior that would have occurred if no callback was registered at
all, which was not possible prior to this change.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3158)
(cherry picked from commit 8313a787d770ac1d7ddafcbc41b13e7fb5841eae)
Backport of 69687aa829bc8bdcaf5468eb3dd0ada13700b7aa
(Merged from #3069)
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3079)
deallocated by a call to the free function in tls_decrypt_ticket.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2897)
Changing the ciphersuite during a renegotiation can result in a crash
leading to a DoS attack. ETM has not been implemented in 1.1.0 for DTLS
so this is TLS only.
The problem is caused by changing the flag indicating whether to use ETM
or not immediately on negotiation of ETM, rather than at CCS. Therefore,
during a renegotiation, if the ETM state is changing (usually due to a
change of ciphersuite), then an error/crash will occur.
Due to the fact that there are separate CCS messages for read and write
we actually now need two flags to determine whether to use ETM or not.
CVE-2017-3733
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
session_ctx and initial_ctx are aliases of each other, and with the
opaque data structures, there's no need to keep both around. Since
there were more references of session_ctx, replace all instances of
initial_ctx with session_ctx.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/2340)
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1597)
(cherry picked from commit 3e37351834c203421b7f492dd83d5e5872e17778)
The previous commit inspired a review of all the length checks for the
extension adding code. This adds more robust checks and adds checks where
some were missing previously. The real solution for this is to use WPACKET
which is currently in master - but that cannot be applied to release
branches.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
The status request extension did not correctly check its length, meaning
that writing the extension could go 2 bytes beyond the buffer size. In
practice this makes little difference because, due to logic in buffer.c the
buffer is actually over allocated by approximately 5k!
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
I use the word 'negotiation' advisedly. Because that's all we were doing.
We negotiated it, set the TLS1_FLAGS_ENCRYPT_THEN_MAC flag in our data
structure, and then utterly ignored it in both dtls_process_record()
and do_dtls1_write().
Turn it off for 1.1.0; we'll fix it for 1.1.1 and by the time that's
released, hopefully 1.1.0b will be ancient history.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
If a server sent multiple NPN extensions in a single ClientHello then a
mem leak can occur. This will only happen where the client has requested
NPN in the first place. It does not occur during renegotiation. Therefore
the maximum that could be leaked in a single connection with a malicious
server is 64k (the maximum size of the ServerHello extensions section). As
this is client side, only occurs if NPN has been requested and does not
occur during renegotiation this is unlikely to be exploitable.
Issue reported by Shi Lei.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
A malicious client can send an excessively large OCSP Status Request
extension. If that client continually requests renegotiation,
sending a large OCSP Status Request extension each time, then there will
be unbounded memory growth on the server. This will eventually lead to a
Denial Of Service attack through memory exhaustion. Servers with a
default configuration are vulnerable even if they do not support OCSP.
Builds using the "no-ocsp" build time option are not affected.
I have also checked other extensions to see if they suffer from a similar
problem but I could not find any other issues.
CVE-2016-6304
Issue reported by Shi Lei.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
If a ticket callback changes the HMAC digest to SHA512 the existing
sanity checks are not sufficient and an attacker could perform a DoS
attack with a malformed ticket. Add additional checks based on
HMAC size.
Thanks to Shi Lei for reporting this bug.
CVE-2016-6302
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Run util/openssl-format-source on ssl/
Some comments and hand-formatted tables were fixed up
manually by disabling auto-formatting.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
When handling ECDH check to see if the curve is "custom" (X25519 is
currently the only curve of this type) and instead of setting a curve
NID just allocate a key of appropriate type.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
- Always process ALPN (previously there was an early return in the
certificate status handling)
- Don't send a duplicate alert. Previously, both
ssl_check_clienthello_tlsext_late and its caller would send an
alert. Consolidate alert sending code in the caller.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1264)
When session tickets are used, it's possible that SNI might swtich the
SSL_CTX on an SSL. Normally, this is not a problem, because the
initial_ctx/session_ctx are used for all session ticket/id processes.
However, when the SNI callback occurs, it's possible that the callback
may update the options in the SSL from the SSL_CTX, and this could
cause SSL_OP_NO_TICKET to be set. If this occurs, then two bad things
can happen:
1. The session ticket TLSEXT may not be written when the ticket expected
flag is set. The state machine transistions to writing the ticket, and
the client responds with an error as its not expecting a ticket.
2. When creating the session ticket, if the ticket key cb returns 0
the crypto/hmac contexts are not initialized, and the code crashes when
trying to encrypt the session ticket.
To fix 1, if the ticket TLSEXT is not written out, clear the expected
ticket flag.
To fix 2, consider a return of 0 from the ticket key cb a recoverable
error, and write a 0 length ticket and continue. The client-side code
can explicitly handle this case.
Fix these two cases, and add unit test code to validate ticket behavior.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1098)
This involves providing more session ticket key data, for both the cipher and
the digest
Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
GH: #515, MR: #2153
Since 50932c4 "PACKETise ServerHello processing",
ssl_next_proto_validate() incorrectly allows empty protocol name.
draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-04[1] says "Implementations MUST ensure that
the empty string is not included and that no byte strings are
truncated."
This patch restores the old correct behavior.
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-04
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Per RFC 5246,
Note: this extension is not meaningful for TLS versions prior to 1.2.
Clients MUST NOT offer it if they are offering prior versions.
However, even if clients do offer it, the rules specified in [TLSEXT]
require servers to ignore extensions they do not understand.
Although second sentence would suggest that there would be no interop
problems in always offering the extension, WebRTC has reported issues
with Bouncy Castle on < TLS 1.2 ClientHellos that still include
signature_algorithms. See also
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=4223
RT#4390
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
Make OBJ_name_cmp internal
Rename idea_xxx to IDEA_xxx
Rename get_rfc_xxx to BN_get_rfc_xxx
Rename v3_addr and v3_asid functions to X509v3_...
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Move the dh_st structure into an internal header file and provide
relevant accessors for the internal fields.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
* Clear proposed, along with selected, before looking at ClientHello
* Add test case for above
* Clear NPN seen after selecting ALPN on server
* Minor documentation updates
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Don't have #error statements in header files, but instead wrap
the contents of that file in #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_xxx
This means it is now always safe to include the header file.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
If a call to EVP_DecryptUpdate fails then a memory leak could occur.
Ensure that the memory is freed appropriately.
Issue reported by Guido Vranken.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
